CAcert Code Development list.

[Ian G <iang AT cacert.org>]

On 16/03/2010 22:03, 
ulrich AT cacert.org
 wrote:
> So now, who is wrong, who is right ?


In which case, Harold or Harrold has generated a definate dispute, and 
the Arbitrator will need to resolve it.

Point being here that it might solve a lot of easier cases.  And move 
harder cases forward!

So the question then would be ... ok, this idea is not the magix elixar 
to solve all assurance & arbitrator woes  .... but does it help, does it 
hinder, and does it help more than it hinders?

I'm not sure.  Partly because the notion of adding MORE info might 
confuse things, and might trigger a rethink about permissions and 
privacy and so forth.  But I think not, because we already add the location.

As I say, it's a strawman :)

iang

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature