Subject: CAcert Code Development list.
List archive
- From: Wytze van der Raay <wytze AT cacert.org>
- To: "Kenneth R. van Wyk" <ken AT krvw.com>
- Cc: inopiae AT cacert.org, Michael Tänzer <michael.taenzer AT cacert.org>, "critical-admin AT cacert.org" <critical-admin AT cacert.org>, cacert-devel AT lists.cacert.org, Ulrich Schröter CAce rt <ulrich AT cacert.org>, Dirk Astrath <dirk.astrath AT cacert.org>, Daniel Wagner <dwkwaxi AT gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: Patch request: Bug #540
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:22:41 +0200
- Organization: CAcert
Hi Ken,
On 27.07.2012 20:33, Kenneth R. van Wyk wrote:
> On Jul 27, 2012, at 1:36 PM, INOPIAE (Marcus)
> <inopiae AT cacert.org>
> wrote:
>> Yes that is how it works.
>
> That's what I was afraid you were going to say, because that means that
> this bug (540) is NOT yet resolved.
>
> Something is different between the production and test systems, because the
> certificate I generated on the test system during testing worked fine on my
> iOS devices, but the ones I've generated this afternoon on the production
> server do NOT.
>
> I can import the certificates, but I cannot use them for S/MIME with iOS
> Mail at all.
>
> Again, this functionality worked FINE on the testbed system months ago.
> Something is still wrong here.
Do you still have the working certificate from the test system?
If so, could you please send us the output from these:
openssl x509 -in old-working-certificate -text -noout
openssl x509 -in new-nonworking-certificate -text -noout
Even if you don't have the old working certificate anymore, it will
still be useful to send us the output for the new-nonworking-cert.
At least we will be able to see whether all flags got set as they
were supposed to ...
> Sorry.
Thank you very much for your feedback, only in that way we can resolve
this problem for real.
Regards,
-- wytze
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, (continued)
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, David McIlwraith, 07/25/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, David McIlwraith, 07/25/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, Kenneth R. van Wyk, 07/25/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, Wytze van der Raay, 07/25/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, Kenneth R. van Wyk, 07/26/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, Wytze van der Raay, 07/26/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, Kenneth R. van Wyk, 07/26/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, Wytze van der Raay, 07/27/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, Kenneth R. van Wyk, 07/27/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, INOPIAE (Marcus), 07/27/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, Kenneth R. van Wyk, 07/27/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, Wytze van der Raay, 07/28/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, Kenneth R. van Wyk, 07/30/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, David McIlwraith, 07/31/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, Kenneth R. van Wyk, 07/30/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, Wytze van der Raay, 07/28/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, Kenneth R. van Wyk, 07/27/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, INOPIAE (Marcus), 07/27/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, Kenneth R. van Wyk, 07/27/2012
- Re: Patch request: Bug #540, David McIlwraith, 07/25/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.