Subject: CAcert Code Development list.
List archive
- From: Wytze van der Raay <wytze AT cacert.org>
- To: Benny Baumann <benbe AT cacert.org>
- Cc: Eva Stöwe <eva.stoewe AT cacert.org>, Developers CAcert <cacert-devel AT lists.cacert.org>
- Subject: Re: CCA Policy Mailing
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:51:01 +0200
- Organization: CAcert
Hi Benny,
On 09/26/2014 08:45 AM, Benny Baumann wrote:
> ...
>>> 239689 received
>>> 235122 delivered
>>> 1 forwarded
>>> 9786 deferred (70825 deferrals)
>>> 27462 bounced
>>> 0 rejected (0%)
>>> 0 reject warnings
>>> 0 held
>>> 0 discarded (0%)
>>>
>>> 1282m bytes received
>>> 1312m bytes delivered
>>> 1 senders
>>> 1 sending hosts/domains
>>> 205452 recipients
>>> 95811 recipient hosts/domains
>
> Interesting stats. Although some things don't seem to add up. IMHO.
> Shouldn't it be more like about 280k mails? Or do we really have about
> 50k deleted accounts?
I don't think we have that many deleted accounts. But I am wondering
about the inclusion of the:
AND `modified` != '0000-00-00 00:00:00'
criterion in the selection of accounts to be mailed. Does `modified`
really have to be set for an active and valid account?
Regards,
-- wytze
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
- CCA Policy Mailing, Benny Baumann, 09/24/2014
- Re: CCA Policy Mailing, Wytze van der Raay, 09/24/2014
- Re: CCA Policy Mailing, Wytze van der Raay, 09/25/2014
- Re: CCA Policy Mailing, Eva Stöwe, 09/25/2014
- Re: CCA Policy Mailing, Benny Baumann, 09/26/2014
- Re: CCA Policy Mailing, Wytze van der Raay, 09/26/2014
- Re: CCA Policy Mailing, Benny Baumann, 09/26/2014
- Re: CCA Policy Mailing, Eva Stöwe, 09/25/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.