Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cacert-devel - Re: Fwd: Re: [website form email]: Misleading information in FAQ

Subject: CAcert Code Development list.

List archive

Re: Fwd: Re: [website form email]: Misleading information in FAQ


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Bernhard Fröhlich <bernhard AT cacert.org>
  • To: Brian McCullough <bmccullough AT cacert.org>, cacert-devel AT lists.cacert.org
  • Cc: alkas AT volny.cz
  • Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [website form email]: Misleading information in FAQ
  • Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 17:13:00 +0100

Am 10.01.2020 um 12:59 schrieb Brian McCullough:
Ted,

This appears to be the last message in the thread, and now that I re-read it, I see some questionable information.

I don't understand his reference to "root.crt" and "class3.crt" since those are not mentioned on either "Page 3" or, as far as I can see, on that Wiki page.  Those names do appear on the Wiki page, but only as the target of a copy from the "correct" certificates.

If we are talking about Ales' statement that he quotes, or appears to quote, I'm not sure where it comes from. I have tried to read back through the threads that seem to be related, and I do not find that statement.

I suppose that a direct conversation with Johan, or Ales, might be in order.

Ahh yes, now I remember... He was using an "undocumented"(1) link directly to the root certificate, which we were afraid to replace...

I see that Aleš has already fixed the corresponding WiKi page last week (thanks for that!)... When having a look at https://wiki.cacert.org/FAQ/ImportRootCert#Creating the mentioned checksums look a bit unfamilliar to me, maybe these are indeed still wrong? I'll have to look a bit closer this evening.

The basic problem ist that we have the checksums distributed over a vast number of locations. This initially seemed to be a good idea, because it makes it very hard to maliciously place a different checksum. But, on the other hand, it also makes it difficult to rightfully place a different checksum... :-\

Kind regards
Ted
;)

(1) "undocumented" meaning here: Only documented on some more or less obscure WiKi page(s)...



Brian




-------- Forwarded Message --------

Hi Aleš,

One, the certificate currently downloadable from the CAcert site is not
the same that was used to produced the sample files and checksums on the
site.

To be more specific: the certs downloadable from page
https://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=3 are serial 15 (root) and serial 14
(class3). The cert produced by https://www.cacert.org/certs/root.crt is
serial 0 (same for class3.crt).

For the description on
https://wiki.cacert.org/FAQ/ImportRootCert#Importing, apparently the serial
0 certs are used, with openssl version 0.x (2014).

[...]


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page