Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cacert-policy - Re: [CAcert-Policy] offer of policy/practices help

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

Re: [CAcert-Policy] offer of policy/practices help


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Philipp Gühring <pg AT futureware.at>
  • To: Policy-Discussion <cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org>
  • Subject: Re: [CAcert-Policy] offer of policy/practices help
  • Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 02:34:13 +0200
  • List-archive: <http://lists.cacert.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/cacert-policy>
  • List-id: Policy-Discussion <cacert-policy.lists.cacert.org>
  • Organization: Futureware 2001

Hi Peter,

Welcome to CAcert, and thanks for your help!

> ill do some modern analysis of
> http://www.access.gpo.gov/bis/ear/pdf/ccl5-pt2.pdf in due course.

I can´t find much CA related in both documents. I can only find things 
about the (to me already known) encryption/signature products, but nothing 
that clearly refers to CA´s.
And since CAcert does not distribute/sell/export/... software (or any other 
encryption devices/products), I don´t think that it applies to CAcert itself.

Now I read the second document (742.pdf), but I don´t think that a 
certificate 
can be classified as "material necessary for encryption". I think that they 
meant something else there.

By the way, CAcert is based in Australia, so it does not fall under 
USA-export 
restrictions, only import restrictions could apply (but I haven´t heard about 
something like that yet)

The only import restriction is DMCA, which is not a topic for CAcert, as far 
as I know.

Regards,
Philipp Gühring





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page