Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cacert-policy - [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

[CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jens Paul <cacert AT canyonsport.de>
  • To: "#L# Maling List \"Policy\"" <cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org>
  • Subject: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?
  • Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:05:19 +0100
  • List-archive: <http://lists.cacert.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/cacert-policy>
  • List-id: Policy-Discussion <cacert-policy.lists.cacert.org>

Hello again,

it seems that the discussion about "under 18 Assurers" endet without a conclusion.

If I got it right, the majority liked the idea that "under 18" Assurers should only be allowed to assure people if their Assurance is countersigned by an "over 18" Assurer guardian.

Can we "write it down" that way? If yes, how could we implement such a procedure?

Greetings
Jens
begin:vcard
fn:Jens Paul
n:Paul;Jens
org:CAcert Inc.
email;internet:cacert AT canyonsport.de
title:Education Officer
version:2.1
end:vcard




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page