Policy-Discussion

[Jens Paul <cacert AT canyonsport.de>]

Hi Duane
> Although this raises a good point in general that the document wasn't
> labelled informational, so it seems to be taken as policy, perhaps we
> need to assign RFC style tags to documents to prevent similar confusing
> in the future.
>
> This would have the side benefit of people knowing what is ratified as
> policy and what isn't and people should refrain from posting policy like
> documents unless it actually is policy.
>   


YES! As I pointed out before the problem right know is that we label the 
wiki "unoffical" (due to good reasons) and so people always discuss 
whether something in the wiki is "offical" or "policy" or if it's just 
some writing by someone. If you implement such a tag system we can keep 
the benefit of everyone writing to the wiki AND people can see whether 
they can trust an entry or if the should take such an entry with care. 
I'd like it that way. Would help to throw away much of the confusion we 
have :-)

Greetings
Jens
begin:vcard
fn:Jens Paul
n:Paul;Jens
org:CAcert Inc.
email;internet:cacert AT canyonsport.de
title:Education Officer
version:2.1
end:vcard