Policy-Discussion

[Sven Anderson <sven AT anderson.de>]

Hi,

Jens Paul, 20.02.2007 18:47:
>> 4.  The zero option -- turn off all Youth Assurance.
> 
> I don't like loosing all those youth assurers, but I think it is the
> only way we could handle that issue.

if the goal of the CACert WOT is to be a kind of legally binding and as in
most countries signatures of under 18 years old are not (fully) legally
binding, there is no loss in that respect. (Although I see that it is a
good practice for upcoming assurers, but it shouldn't be part of the WOT.)


Cheers,

Sven

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature