Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Philipp Gühring <pg AT futureware.at>
- To: Policy-Discussion <cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org>
- Subject: Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:24:11 +0100
- List-archive: <http://lists.cacert.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/cacert-policy>
- List-id: Policy-Discussion <cacert-policy.lists.cacert.org>
- Organization: Futureware 2001
Hi,
> if the goal of the CACert WOT is to be a kind of legally binding
Due to the current security situation of the Internet, I would say that we
currently have the goal of providing NOT legally binding certificates.
Anything else would create a false impression of security, which we cannot
represent.
> and as in
> most countries signatures of under 18 years old are not (fully) legally
> binding, there is no loss in that respect.
> (Although I see that it is a
> good practice for upcoming assurers, but it shouldn't be part of the WOT.)
If we want to keep out youths out of the WOT, we should also keep out adults
out of the WOT, since they are also a threat, and in practice, they are a
validated threat already, compared to the theoretical threat of the youths.
Best regards,
Philipp Gühring
- [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Jens Paul, 02/18/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Ian G, 02/19/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Jens Paul, 02/20/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Ian G, 02/20/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Jens Paul, 02/20/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Jac Kersing, 02/20/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Jens Paul, 02/20/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Philipp Gühring, 02/21/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Sven Anderson, 02/21/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Philipp Gühring, 02/21/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Ian G, 02/22/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Duane, 02/22/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Sven Anderson, 02/22/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Philipp Gühring, 02/22/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Ian G, 02/22/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Sven Anderson, 02/23/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Jens Paul, 02/28/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Philipp Gühring, 02/21/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Jac Kersing, 02/20/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Sven Anderson, 02/23/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Jens Paul, 02/20/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Ian G, 02/20/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Jens Paul, 02/20/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Ian G, 02/19/2007
- [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?, Ian G, 02/22/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?, Duane, 02/22/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.