Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Bernhard Froehlich <ted AT convey.de>
- To: Policy-Discussion <cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org>
- Subject: Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:49:00 +0100
- List-archive: <http://lists.cacert.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/cacert-policy>
- List-id: Policy-Discussion <cacert-policy.lists.cacert.org>
Duane schrieb:
Bernhard Froehlich wrote:Hey, great idea to read that! ;)
The 2 photo ID thing was only supposed to be for TTP, in personSo this IS policy? One photo ID is enough for in person assurances? I
assurances only required 1 photo ID, for exactly the reasons you outline.
have seen many assurers (one of them quite occasionally in my bathroom
mirror) which insist that at least two photo IDs are required!
Probably the statements on those wiki pages are from me, so I'll have to
correct them (after having cross-checked the CPS once more).
It's clearly written on the Assurance form that two govt issued IDs are
required, one MUST be a photo ID, I thought that should have been
official enough.
The form I just downloaded from the server reads "... and verified their identity against one or more original, trusted, government photo identity documents." So I'd assume from this that even a single govt issued photo ID would suffice.
Now I had a look at the current CPS using http://www.cacert.org/cps.php#p5.2 (by the way, is there any other way beside asking Google to find this page?):
>>>>>>>>>>
To have trust points issued in a face to face meeting there is strict guidelines on how this must be achieved to be recognised by CAcert:
* the person issuing the trust points must see 2 forms of photo ID:
At least one photo ID must be issued by a government body.
Acceptable forms of ID include Passports, Drivers Licenses and ID
Cards
<<<<<<<<<<<
Which is rather close to the statement on the form as well as your statement, but not quite identical to either one...
Maybe the forms should be adjusted to the CPS, or is the CPS due to adapt to the form?
Ted
;)
--
PGP Public Key Information
Download complete Key from http://www.convey.de/ted/tedkey_convey.asc
Key fingerprint = 31B0 E029 BCF9 6605 DAC1 B2E1 0CC8 70F4 7AFB 8D26
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, (continued)
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Philipp Gühring, 02/22/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Ian G, 02/22/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Sven Anderson, 02/23/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Jens Paul, 02/28/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Conclusion about youth assurers?, Sven Anderson, 02/23/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?, Duane, 02/22/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?, Bernhard Froehlich, 02/22/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?, Duane, 02/22/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?, Ian G, 02/22/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?, Bernhard Froehlich, 02/22/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?, Duane, 02/23/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?, Bernhard Froehlich, 02/23/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?, Ian G, 02/23/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?, Sven Anderson, 02/23/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.