Policy-Discussion

[Bernhard Froehlich <ted AT convey.de>]

Duane schrieb:
> [...]
> *sigh* this has happened from time to time, where people introduce their
> own "standards" that don't match the official line, however the current
> policy (as per the official english version of the assurance form) is
> you need at least 1 photo ID, but ideally you should present 2 forms of
> government issued ID.
>   
[...]

If  "personal standards not matching the official line" are making it 
into very official looking documents on the official CAcert website it 
indeed sounds like quite a problem to me. How can I know where to look, 
just in case I to have a definitive statement? The next time I ask the 
same question here I may receive an answer pointing me to the CPS. How 
about marking the CPS invalid if it is so?

I know (now) that the current draft CPS tries to avoid a definitive 
statement on what is needed for an assurance and refers to the Assurance 
Handbook for specific procedures. And the latter supports the version of 
the policy that is printed on the forms.

Ted
;)

--
PGP Public Key Information
Download complete Key from http://www.convey.de/ted/tedkey_convey.asc
Key fingerprint = 31B0 E029 BCF9 6605 DAC1  B2E1 0CC8 70F4 7AFB 8D26

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature