Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Jens Paul <cacert AT canyonsport.de>
- To: Policy-Discussion <cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org>
- Subject: Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:07:58 +0100
- List-archive: <http://lists.cacert.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/cacert-policy>
- List-id: Policy-Discussion <cacert-policy.lists.cacert.org>
Hi!
Which leads to the question of approval ... like the one on the cacert site, the futureware one is also unapproved. The difference is that the earlier document is unlikely to ever be approved, and the futureware document is a WIP destined for approval.
OK, so it's at least easy for me: As the old one will never be approved, I'll do my education work based on the new one. So the only "problem" I have is that I need to check the CPS status from time to time and see if there have been new developments which I need to include in my material.
For education purposes it doesn't matter if the document is approved or not. It only matters which document is considered the leading document by CAcert. So if we can say that an Arbitrator would decide on base of the new CPS, I would use it as well, no matter if it is approved or not :-)
Greetings
Jens
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?, Ian G, 03/01/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?, Ian G, 03/01/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?, Ian G, 03/01/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?, Jens Paul, 03/01/2007
- Re: [CAcert-Policy] Is it ONE photo-id or is it TWO photo-ids?, Bernhard Froehlich, 03/05/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.