Policy-Discussion

[Bernhard Froehlich <ted AT convey.de>]

Ian G schrieb:
> [...]
> Which leads to the question of approval ... like the one on 
> the cacert site, the futureware one is also unapproved.  The 
> difference is that the earlier document is unlikely to ever 
> be approved, and the futureware document is a WIP destined 
> for approval.
>   
So, if the old one on http://www.cacert.org/cps.php is not approved and 
will never see approvement, why don't we just replace it with the draft 
on futerware (after explicitly marking it as a draft)? This way, at 
least the status quo would could be researched by someone who was not 
part of the crew from the beginning.
Should I file a bug report to this effect (I have not checked if there 
is already one)?

Ted
;)

--
PGP Public Key Information
Download complete Key from http://www.convey.de/ted/tedkey_convey.asc
Key fingerprint = 31B0 E029 BCF9 6605 DAC1  B2E1 0CC8 70F4 7AFB 8D26

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature