Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cacert-policy - Re: [CAcert-Policy] cacert-p] how the military does safety

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

Re: [CAcert-Policy] cacert-p] how the military does safety


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Philipp Gühring <pg AT futureware.at>
  • To: Policy-Discussion <cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org>
  • Subject: Re: [CAcert-Policy] cacert-p] how the military does safety
  • Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:52:34 +0100
  • List-archive: <http://lists.cacert.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/cacert-policy>
  • List-id: Policy-Discussion <cacert-policy.lists.cacert.org>
  • Organization: Futureware 2001

Hi,

> For me, that answer is absolutely fine. I still like the idea of a local
> arbitration during large events, but we can push that issue back for a
> while and see if we really need it or not. For know, I can work on the
> education stuff based on the "file a dispute" mechanism.

I think we should first try to succeed the challenge of remote arbitration, 
and afterwards think about whether we need local arbitration, and how we 
could do that in practice.


While we are at Arbitration:
http://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/ProductManagers

Should we add the position for an Arbitration Officer?
Is anyone here interested in that position?

Best regards,
Philipp





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page