Policy-Discussion

[Guillaume ROMAGNY <gr AT grhq.net>]

Hi Jac,

Jac Kersing a écrit :
> On Mon, 14 May 2007, Philipp [iso-8859-1] Gühring wrote:
> 
>> Binding a server certificate to an individual isn´t a good idea, since
>> the
>> mapping isn´t very useful in practice.
> 
> Philipp,
> 
> I'm confused. According to your statement (above) binding server
> certificates to an individual is not a good idea. Yet all organizational
> certificates issues by CAcert seem to do this:
> ...
> Subject: C=NL, L=Groningen, O=The-Box Development,
> CN=<someserver>.the-box.com/emailAddress=j.kersing AT the-box.com
> ...
> 
> As you might be able to imagine I would much rather use a generic e-mail
> address in the certificates, not my personal address. However, I have
> not found a way to change this. My mistake or is it not possible?

ok, it is your contact email for the Org. But it could be
support AT the-box.com
 instead (or something else).

Would like to have another email for this ?

Please send the request to support@

-- 
Best regards,

Guillaume

Vision without action is a daydream. Action without vision is a
nightmare.  -- Japanese Proverb

MSN 
wildcat_paris AT hotmail.fr
 IRC 
wildcat_paris AT irc.cacert.org

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature