Policy-Discussion

[maurice Kellenaers <maurice AT gkbikes.com>]

Philipp Dunkel wrote:
> On 2008-10-16, at 12:40, maurice Kellenaers wrote:
>
> > Philipp Dunkel wrote:
> > > There are several ways this could be accomplished. The first would 
> > > be to rely on assurances. Someone suggested that if there were 2 
> > > assurers in HR they could assure all new employees. That would be 
> > > one way. But since the statement is verified and not assured another 
> > > way could be to check the CN against a paycheck database or other 
> > > such database available to the employer.
> > I opt for the second; check against dB. Small companies don't have 2 
> > persons on HR (maybe not even 2 persons employed), maybe just the 
> > o-admin as sole assurer.
> > >
> Well actually I think this is not an either or decision we have to 
> make? Leave it to the organisation itself. What is good for one may 
> not be for the other. So why not just leave all options open?
true, and that brings us back to the question: how can/does CAcert 
verify the info.
> Regards, Philipp
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Have you passed the Assurer Challenge yet?
> http://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/AssurerChallenge
>
> CAcert-Policy mailing list
> CAcert-Policy AT lists.cacert.org
> https://lists.cacert.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cacert-policy
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature