Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cacert-policy - Re: [CAcert-Policy] CPS bugs. Vote please. Colosing date of votes21 October 12pm UTC

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

Re: [CAcert-Policy] CPS bugs. Vote please. Colosing date of votes21 October 12pm UTC


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Philipp Dunkel <p.dunkel AT cacert.org>
  • To: Policy-Discussion <cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org>
  • Subject: Re: [CAcert-Policy] CPS bugs. Vote please. Colosing date of votes21 October 12pm UTC
  • Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 07:45:41 +0200
  • List-archive: <https://lists.cacert.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/cacert-policy>
  • List-id: Policy-Discussion <cacert-policy.lists.cacert.org>

We don't. But we need 3 words for 3 concepts. 

Assurance = verification via WoT
Validation = verifcation via lesser means

Verification = Assurance + Validation

R, Phil

---
Philipp Dunkel
Tel: +43-720-407204
Fax: +43-1-3060903-9
---
Your reality and mine may not entirely coincide. Therefore you may not rely on this message meaning what you believe it means. 
---

On Oct 18, 2008, at 6:06, "Sam Johnston" <samj AT samj.net> wrote:

2008/10/17 Tomáš Trnka <TomTrnka AT seznam.cz>

> The problem is that verified is not available.
<snip>
> Now if you have a better word for C I am eagerly awaiting it.

I would like "validated" a bit more (and even more thinking about automated
checking)...What do the others think?

Why do we need three words to describe one concept? Simplicity is the key to our success and all this sounds like academic wankery; somebody please explain what benefit is percieved from confusing the hell out of our users.

Sam

_______________________________________________
Have you passed the Assurer Challenge yet?
http://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/AssurerChallenge

CAcert-Policy mailing list
CAcert-Policy AT lists.cacert.org
https://lists.cacert.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cacert-policy



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page