Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cacert-policy - Re: [CAcert-Policy] CPS bugs. Vote please. Colosing date of votes21 October 12pm UTC

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

Re: [CAcert-Policy] CPS bugs. Vote please. Colosing date of votes21 October 12pm UTC


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Greg Stark" <gstark AT electrorent.com>
  • To: "'Policy-Discussion'" <cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org>
  • Subject: Re: [CAcert-Policy] CPS bugs. Vote please. Colosing date of votes21 October 12pm UTC
  • Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:34:56 -0700
  • List-archive: <https://lists.cacert.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/cacert-policy>
  • List-id: Policy-Discussion <cacert-policy.lists.cacert.org>

I vote Aye.
Greg

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> cacert-policy-bounces AT lists.cacert.org
>  [mailto:cacert-policy-
> bounces AT lists.cacert.org]
>  On Behalf Of IanG
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 12:30 PM
> To: Policy-Discussion
> Subject: Re: [CAcert-Policy] CPS bugs. Vote please. Colosing date of votes21
> October 12pm UTC
> 
> Peter Williams wrote:
> >
> > Folks are taking technical counsel, on how best to vote, I assume.
> >
> > Or is there a rule that commenting, during the voting period, is
> > suspended? (I’ve seen that before now).
> 
> 
> No, there is no such rule.
> 
> > Where does the vote stand?
> 
> http://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/PolicyDecisions
> 
> So far, 8 votes have been collected as Aye, some interpolating from
> previous claims made.  No Nays.
> 
> Another 3.5 hours :)
> 
> > By the way, the verb confirmed is used as a subprocedure of validation:
> >  checking the subscriber’s claim of a name, and the right to use said ,
> > is ”confirmation”
> 
> OK.
> 
> > From what I recall, this had a basis in legal “acknowledgement”
> > protocols. Acknowledgements are specific types of statements on which
> > one may rely, with specifically limited legal semantics well suited to
> > that “pre-acceptance” phase of the certification process.
> 
> Seems a stretch.  For that to work, all the parties would have to be
> happy with the protocol.  It's not much use telling the victim
> afterwards that "no" means "yes" in the language of the borg, and
> here in clause 93.b(i) of the Federation StarFleet Pilot's Agreement
> it clearly says that when issuing certificates, we talk like the borg...
> 
> iang
> _______________________________________________
> Have you passed the Assurer Challenge yet?
> http://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/AssurerChallenge
> 
> CAcert-Policy mailing list
> CAcert-Policy AT lists.cacert.org
> https://lists.cacert.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cacert-policy

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page