Policy-Discussion

["Peter Williams" <home_pw AT msn.com>]

Name the CAs whatever you want. Ensure the CPS notes which cert class the
names correspond to. An audit test is to determine if the CA claims
assurance class/level, using a class/level scheme that the intended RP
community is able to comprehend.


-----Original Message-----
From: 
cacert-policy-bounces AT lists.cacert.org
[mailto:cacert-policy-bounces AT lists.cacert.org]
 On Behalf Of Guillaume
ROMAGNY
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 4:10 AM
To: Policy-Discussion
Cc: CAcert System Administrators
Subject: Re: [CAcert-Policy] Sub-CA for anonymous certificates

Hi Sven,

Sven Anderson a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> Am 28.10.2008 um 22:25 schrieb Guillaume ROMAGNY:
> 
>> We still need volunteers to create client/server certificates and put 
>> them on test webservers or send signed emails.
> 
> according to my mail a few days ago:
> 
> May I suggest, that you create two sub-CAs of the root CA, one for the 
> class 3 certificates, and one for anonymous (email-address-based) CAs?
> Or is this planned anyways?

If you have a look at the wiki page, this is what we are doing.

Excepted we have dropped the class1 class3 naming and replaced by CAcert
Member (formerly class1) CAcert Assured Member (formerly class3)

--
Cordialement, Best regards,

Guillaume
Tiebogos (by L'Oreal), parce que je le 'veau' bien.

Vision without action is a daydream. Action without vision is a nightmare.
-- Japanese Proverb