Policy-Discussion

[Sam Johnston <samj AT samj.net>]

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Ian G (Audit) <iang AT cacert.org> wrote:

On this point, there is a discussion now going on over at Mozilla where any upgrades will have to be covered by Audit.  So that may need to be factored into the above, if a "ruling" comes down on this issue from the Mozilla process.

Ok so what you're saying is that if it doesn't go in this time we're going to have to audit again later? I guess that answers our question then...

So:
 - OA follows AP as much as possible
 - Need to work out a process that won't piss off 'clients' too much
 - Need to decide on exceptions for orgs vs individuals (eg ability to assure)

Sound about right?

Sam