cacert-policy - Re: Multiple Assurances

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

Re: Multiple Assurances

From: Werner Dworak <werner.dworak AT cacert.org>
To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
Subject: Re: Multiple Assurances
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:45:30 +0100
Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none

Hello Ian,

> But I put it down to the software issues we have, and I'm not going
> to worry about it. If you think about it, fiddling to fix that will
> result in a complete redesign of that section ... and then we're into
> the resources question.

That I am well aware. I just wanted to mention it, not to be done right
now. But see the headline. If we introduce multiple assurances, this is
just done by the way.

Regards, Werner

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Multiple Assurances, (continued)
- Re: Multiple Assurances, Ian G, 10/11/2009
  - Re: Multiple Assurances, Faramir, 10/12/2009
    - Re: Multiple Assurances, Werner Dworak, 10/12/2009
      - Re: Multiple Assurances, dirk astrath, 10/12/2009
        
        Re: Multiple Assurances, Faramir, 10/13/2009

List archive

Re: Multiple Assurances