Policy-Discussion

[Alexander Prinsier <aphexer AT cacert.org>]

Here are some suggestions I made a long time ago, but I got no reaction.
Retrying...

On 11/17/2009 07:52 PM, Alexander Prinsier wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> 3 issues:
> 
> 1) In Appendix I for Belgium:
> 
> Kruispuntbank van Onderneminge
> 
> should be changed to:
> 
> Kruispuntbank van Ondernemingen
> 
> (just add a 'n' at the end).
> 
> The first URL should be changed from:
> 
> http://kbo-bce-ps.economie.fgov.be/ps/kbo_ps/kbo_search.jsp?Action=SKW
> 
> to:
> 
> http://kbopub.economie.fgov.be/kbopub/zoekwoordenform.html?lang=nl
> 
> and the second one from:
> 
> http://kbo-bce-ps.economie.fgov.be/ps/kbo_ps/kbo_search.jsp?Action=SKW
> 
> to:
> 
> http://kbopub.economie.fgov.be/kbopub/zoekwoordenform.html?lang=fr
> 
> The government has put a new website in place. For now there is a
> redirect from the old URL to the new one, but not sure how long that
> will last :)
> 
> 2)
> 
> Section 2.2 Records, point b, it states:
> 
> "acquired by the Organisation Assurer by the OA"
> 
> should probably be changed to:
> 
> "acquired by the Organisation Assurer"
> 
> 3)
> 
> * Ian G's proposed change, section 1.3 states:
> 
> "Policy group approval of the Registry is required within one month."
> 
> It isn't perfectly clear to me what it refers to. One month after what?
> 
> * The "full checks on Registry" are not documented? How can you require
> such checks then in a policy?
> 
> * About the 'operational' status of a Registry: a registry is in
> 'operational' status when it has had no full check, but the OAO decides
> it's ok to be used? Then what's the status of a 'normal' registry? It's
> not operational? I'd prefer a better choice of wording here. What about
> calling unchecked registries 'semi-operational registries'?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Alexander

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature