Policy-Discussion

[Faramir <faramir.cl AT gmail.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Philipp Guehring escribió:
> Hi,
>> Who's not and why?
>>   
> I am against it, since we still have users that require Class3
> certificates for their applications.
> One such application I know of is http://registeredcommons.org/

  But way do they need a class 3 certificate? can't they move to class 1?

> There might be others as well that I have not heard about yet.

  Certainly. The thing is why people need a class 3 certificate instead
a class 1 certificate, considering classes are weakly defined and are
not an standard? (or maybe I understood it all wrong).

> Therefore please consider my proposal to discourage our users and
> migrate our users to Class1 where possible, but continue issueing Class3
> for those that need it.

  The problem is while the Class3 certificate exists, the problem will
continue. So we stop using it now (and maybe revoke it at 2012), or we
continue as we are... I don't see a benefit in discouraging its usage,
but still allowing it.

  Best regards
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJLTjarAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAQjQH/34iqX8aAqb3dxRS41T/G5PI
vitO3tswYZqj6In+Ld+EEiXZ5Q/gIQD4jpBMO/Yhlo8q5m6VdNI0b200h47u687R
+vVSq/C3ijmfyri1g7vd38Izg8fJ8DiO2yolG5eoeJIrRr8Cf/n3N9MmMRvLiquk
B1b/4+YiqBDQE0vhCvic6QmZfYrfjsNBqo2MWaYJkhRvsc+7Aw0r7PFXXh2HLclt
qPRKjejaOHbL2GFMHvmS06iHSNU1n4jYOYiBV8nOxexpNJkkzmA8J+RSqwv1F/dp
MIsC8wVHKE8JTfXOnDaBqCCtWEeJr5XLNl+Ius7JCzgxEARYweH7ZvdbTxRnVew=
=NntH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----