Policy-Discussion

[Morten Gulbrandsen <lordbyte7 AT aim.com>]

ulrich AT cacert.org
 wrote:
> Dear Policy Group,

>
>
> We've discussed the PoJAM a lot in past.

>
>
_https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/PolicyOnJuniorAssurersMembers.html_
>


I didn't spot it at the first, second or third time to read,

but it should be clear,

1)
that a Minur, or a junior or both cannot be hold responsible or
accountable. e.g. sued for 1000 EUR.  But breach of trust should be
punished, but how? some Facebook pokes revoked?

2)
can they file a dispute? complain, alert arbitration?

Online minors learn grasp and use the internet iPods mobile devices very
good. It should be easy to read for juniors and minors.

If the member is under 18 years of age,
an additional button must be clicked during an Assurance,

I like this, but it is the same papers to be filled?
    "< 18"  on the paper as pencil note will do.
    "< 18"  as additional comments during issuing trust points may help.

I'm not complaining on the policy, but asking myself, or preparing
myself what do I say, in order to explain the difference?

"They can receive up to 35 points, but never issue more than 10 points."

I think this is higly interesting and I feel the trust points starts to
look like a new currency. Like Linden$ or webcent.  Issuing many trust
point$ cannot harm the global economy. There will be no trust point
bankruptcy or cacert bailout.

I hope for feedback from 14-18 years, and even younger, if they feel
they can use the system for their benefit.

below 14 you can still gain trust points and use it to run your
webserver sign email and code,


Sincerely yours,

Morten Gulbrandsen


_____________________________________________________________________
Java programmer, C++ programmer
CAcert Assurer, GSWoT introducer,
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature