Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Dominik George <nik AT naturalnet.de>
- To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes pleaseI'
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:14:53 +0100
- Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT naturalnet.de; dkim-asp=none
- Authentication-results: mx.b9d.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT naturalnet.de; dkim-adsp=pass
> So, whatever we do, we have to (technically, fully) get the parent's
> permission. So we may as well just do that, regardless, and skip the
> whole "godfather" concept in the policy at least.
Not quite. The cocept I meant to implement is not about skipping parts from
the current PoJAM WIP. The only thing from the document covered by the
godfather concept atm is the amount of points a Minor can give. This is
CAcert
internal and does not depend on any contracts.
To do this, a parent's signature would not be enough. A parent cannot judge
(in most cases) in how far a Junior is competent for CAcert internals.
The point is that there should be romm for discriminating Junior member
(between, not against !!). From a pedagogic point of view, you simply cannot
judge a person by her age alone.
-nik
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, (continued)
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Hans Verbeek, 01/19/2010
- RE: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, ulrich, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Ian G, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Alexander Prinsier, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Morten Gulbrandsen, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes pleaseaye!, Dominik George, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, martin.gummi AT cacert.org, 01/22/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes pleaseaye!, Dominik George, 01/22/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes pleaseI', Dominik George, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes pleaseI', Ian G, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes pleaseI', Dominik George, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes pleaseI', Mario Lipinski, 01/20/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes pleaseI', Dominik George, 01/20/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes pleaseI', Mario Lipinski, 01/20/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes pleaseI', Dominik George, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes pleaseI', Ian G, 01/19/2010
- RE: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, ulrich, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Ian G, 01/19/2010
- RE: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, ulrich, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Brian McCullough, 01/19/2010
- RE: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, ulrich, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Morten Gulbrandsen, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Ian G, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Tomáš Trnka, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Ian G, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Hans Verbeek, 01/19/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.