Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Faramir <faramir.cl AT gmail.com>
- To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:06:54 -0300
- Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT gmail.com; dkim-asp=none
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=VHcp76Xmiysg2e/b+Ct5RpHsesZJE5uEBuP0L1/YNeL2mgvXoljkCKAtnI839SJhKg sCRowTC6fzGDhAqJb9w6z34rLcTO5fjmlF4DPXNgbxO8Ng4VnGkALZrhLfqOgw3k1I0f Sf1RHSPbSdjUkccj6Enr/XC/0DmtBU+RoXe8Q=
- Openpgp: id=4319410E; url=http://tinyurl.com/0x4319410E
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
ulrich AT cacert.org
escribió:
> Dear Policy Group,
...
> We've discussed the PoJAM a lot in past.
> I call on Policy Group to bring back our Juniors:
>
> Therefore, RESOLVED to approve to DRAFT status (under PoP) the Policy on
> Junior Assurers / Members, also known as PoJAM, here
>
> _https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/PolicyOnJuniorAssurersMembers.html_
AYE
By the way, there is no limit on how much young can a member be. While
in principle it is not bad, I remember several forums use to have a "I'm
14 years old or older" check box, they say things about not being
capable of storing personal data for people younger than 14. I don't
know where does it apply, but, maybe we should investigate it?
Best Regards
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJLViz+AAoJEMV4f6PvczxAegwIAILL/oYyaD9e59aIHRfD0jb1
6QVeFV83lyP1w39FUT/bnAl9UVwG2jevckbO2BwkvBGMXq8f/ZHKhMh7ef4pmciH
YFF3DwyGARpRBEW0CWAdCleFCS+ew7PqDfE7XyZFOICSwMCuAxP85ZgBD6Ko2vfm
raQsLfiUm8/THOLQ/tjfLvDrkYJixd/7aK9VtUsNs6z0K2nHpPmZ/Q7JzUdVQNd6
/TyilygNYki3fMhxAqgW9QCfXCBYO2x9cSlih7Kmz+mzF98NtkBatDDHswmMYQSw
rwNDodmqG4kJaQLkpkLzPqXRJyRd2dsYjsspmv836KJHzQ0jAgVk1Rx2XAnTNF8=
=q9ic
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes pleaseI', (continued)
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes pleaseI', Dominik George, 01/20/2010
- RE: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, ulrich, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Ian G, 01/19/2010
- RE: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, ulrich, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Brian McCullough, 01/19/2010
- RE: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, ulrich, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Morten Gulbrandsen, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Ian G, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Tomáš Trnka, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Ian G, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Bernhard Fröhlich, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Faramir, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Mario Lipinski, 01/20/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Nathan Edward Tuggy, 01/27/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Ian G, 01/27/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Nathan Edward Tuggy, 01/27/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Ian G, 01/27/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Morten Gulbrandsen, 01/28/2010
- RE: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, ulrich, 01/28/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, J. Steijlen, 01/19/2010
- Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please, Raoul Xavier Boerlage, 01/28/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.