Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cacert-policy - Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes pleaseI'

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes pleaseI'


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Mario Lipinski <mario AT cacert.org>
  • To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
  • Subject: Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes pleaseI'
  • Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:29:26 +0100
  • Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
  • Organization: CAcert Events, CAcert Organisation Assurance Germany

Am 19.01.10 22:14, schrieb Dominik George:
>  This is CAcert 
> internal and does not depend on any contracts.
> 
> To do this, a parent's signature would not be enough. A parent cannot judge 
> (in most cases) in how far a Junior is competent for CAcert internals.
> 
> The point is that there should be romm for discriminating Junior member 
> (between, not against !!). From a pedagogic point of view, you simply 
> cannot 
> judge a person by her age alone.

From a pedagogic pov you might be right here. However, from the legal
pov (which counts here) everything else might become dificult.

So somehow castrate the Junior/Minor but get on the safe legal site.


Mario


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page