Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cacert-policy - Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Mario Lipinski <mario AT cacert.org>
  • To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
  • Subject: Re: PoJAM to DRAFT, votes please
  • Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:34:48 +0100
  • Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
  • Organization: CAcert Events, CAcert Organisation Assurance Germany

Am 19.01.10 23:06, schrieb Faramir:
>   By the way, there is no limit on how much young can a member be. While
> in principle it is not bad, I remember several forums use to have a "I'm
> 14 years old or older" check box, they say things about not being
> capable of storing personal data for people younger than 14. I don't
> know where does it apply, but, maybe we should investigate it?

This in intended. But since a junior member becomes somehow active we
require the contract be signed by the parent - and we can refer to them.


Mario


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page