Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Faramir <faramir.cl AT gmail.com>
- To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:47:33 -0300
- Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=neutral (verification failed) header.i= AT gmail.com; dkim-asp=none
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ArPCV4R86uLHHdfsJVZe0S8aDDTLXdn3/vt//xonPuQkAHO5YlZPvrkoVS70uo32FQ UqOXKCwrKP2ovkjhU35Hw1hTerkO+swcLAjmC9zQnT8YmvT71shU89GBzGmRxjZOCkT8 DkRWdR5nqWWf5C7QGLz5yUdLN000zFVIn99T8=
- Openpgp: id=4319410E; url=http://tinyurl.com/0x4319410E
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Alexander Prinsier escribió:
...
> RESOLVED, that section 2.2 of the AP is to be amended with the following:
>
> "Except for different names due to marital status, and except for
> exclusion of middle names, the deviation from section 2.1 should be for
> technical reasons only."
>
> Vote Aye if you want the AP to be clear about what is allowed and what
> is not, and specifically require a match with government issued ID.
>
> Vote Naye if you prefer to leave this an open question and allow names
> which are not in government issued ID.
NAYE. I think it is clear the names allowed must be present in a
government issued Photo-ID, if those documents are available in that
country.
Best Regards
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJLV6QlAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAfU4H/A3wsUJkta5pRaAA0Nnq3OS2
smlOhHqDlo2f5oQugL3MdM0ufFoMRSsZzNK1L5liT5rbZBWhTNvLPZvpiY//wbwv
Dt+6PBh8ZoiUEf+ux9fjzN8ZHbV79YyzxWEliJWHqsI4UHJAJh/xDNhCiXKLH1Hd
30X0SjrF5sEl6IwTmdA+K1dJzLYINEXFcUdhFK9QgHjOGB1HZgesiu7zyAmUENZP
5q1LUYx/VDpfhClS9lykweJavXZ1hluBb1IOJnd2+e6xCk5gp7cQzOdR+pYEBQlB
NHUSd7zxs2EgBy8VO+w8x/zHFThZtFz/QjMUtAduysCWMmuxXQaveGsxBGD47JY=
=Jj/5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- RE: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, (continued)
- RE: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, ulrich, 01/20/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Bernhard Fröhlich, 01/20/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Alexander Prinsier, 01/20/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Andreas Bürki, 01/20/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Ian G, 01/21/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Alexander Prinsier, 01/20/2010
- RE: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, ulrich, 01/20/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Mario Lipinski, 01/20/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Pieter van Emmerik, 01/20/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Alexander Prinsier, 01/21/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Ian G, 01/21/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Alexander Prinsier, 01/21/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Faramir, 01/21/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Alexander Prinsier, 01/21/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Mario Lipinski, 01/21/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Ian G, 01/21/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Pieter van Emmerik, 01/21/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Alexander Prinsier, 01/21/2010
- Re: Assurance Policy: match with ID required?, Morten Gulbrandsen, 01/21/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.