Policy-Discussion

[Mario Lipinski <mario AT cacert.org>]

Hi,

Am 21.01.2010 02:03, schrieb Alexander Prinsier:
> It's not sufficiently clear. As an arbitrator I've come across cases
> where members have an assured account with a name which is not on any
> government issued ID. At least all assurers who assured these people
> thought it was not sufficiently clear and ok to do so.
> 
> In these cases the name on the account is a slight variation or an
> abbreviation of the official name.

and imho this is OK as of AP. Since variations are allowed. It is up to
the assurer to accept them or not. I don't, because in Germany it is
quite uncommon to use variations for official purposes.

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards

Mario Lipinski
Organisation Assurer (Germany),     E-Mail: 
mario AT cacert.org
Wiki/Issue admin                    Internet: http://www.cacert.org
CAcert.org

Support CAcert: http://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=13
                http://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/HelpingCAcert

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature