Policy-Discussion

[Nathan Edward Tuggy <nathantuggy AT sti.net>]

On 2010-01-27 13:38, Ian G wrote:
> On 27/01/2010 22:23, Nathan Edward Tuggy wrote:
> > On 2010-01-19 10:31, 
> > ulrich AT cacert.org
> >  wrote:
>
> > > Therefore, RESOLVED to approve to DRAFT status (under PoP) the 
> > > Policy on
> > > Junior Assurers / Members, also known as PoJAM, here
> > >
> > > _https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/PolicyOnJuniorAssurersMembers.html_ 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please signal your vote by reply: aye, naye, abstain.
> > > I will copy into policy decisions.
> >
> > Coming in a bit late :),
>
>
> You and everyone else has until the 30th.

This is true, yes.
> > what's the planned term for this draft before it moves to policy? Just
> > re-reading PoP, which mentions something about pre-announcing the term
> > of draft status:
> > > 4.5 The period of the DRAFT status is announced widely, which should
> > > be at least a month and no longer than a year.
> but I'd like to ask one question before voting:
>
>
> In practice we have never really done that.  Or, let's just say that 
> it is announced widely but quietly as between one month and one year :-)

Ah, OK! I guess that's good enough for now, at any rate... though 
perhaps it would be good to figure out how to make better use of that 
provision.

At any rate, Uli, put me down as voting Aye.

--
Nathan E Tuggy
Software Professional, Security Enthusiast, CAcert Member

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature