Policy-Discussion

[Ian G <iang AT cacert.org>]

On 22/03/2010 02:38, Ernestine wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ian G 
> > [mailto:iang AT cacert.org],
> >  Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 10:13
> AM
> > 2.  As the Assurance was STOPPED, the evidence gathered was
> > incomplete.
> >    In this case, the person freaked because he assumed the
> > documents to be forged.
>
> I don't get it, confuses me -  "he assumed the documents to be forged" ...


Well, this is just what he said, and he was not very clear on this 
point.  Rather panicky.  Also, his English was not commanding, which 
made things more difficult as well.

It could have been for any reason.  As per Barry's reply, there are a 
range of possible reasons for stopping the meeting.  The question is 
whether we should make our advice this:

   "stop whenever you feel like it"

Or

   "try and collect the evidence to the fullest"

with caveat:

   "obviously, safety comes first..."

> which documents from whom?

documents I gather are non-forged (or at least that's what the consulate 
told me when they gave them to me), offered by me.

> Was it a mutual-assurance, and he stopped the assurance as assurer ?


No, it wasn't a mutual assurance.  He was assuring me (albeit with 
co-audit).

iang

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature