Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Andreas Bürki <abuerki AT cacert.org>
- To: cacert-root AT lists.cacert.org
- Cc: Daniel Black <daniel AT cacert.org>, "cacert-board AT lists.cacert.org" <cacert-board AT lists.cacert.org>, "cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org" <cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org>, Lambert <lambert AT cacert.org>
- Subject: Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:47:35 +0100
- Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
- Organization: CAcert Inc.
Thoughts at random:
* Why multi-member approach is not more focused on organizations?
* CAcert ORGA assured organizations are CAcert members as well
* Organizations will probably "live" longer than an human member
* Organizations have very often something to loose, at least
their reputation.
* Organizations have very often the physical infrastructure
to protect root keys
And, yes of course, such organizations could be well known and serious
universities, which are member of CAcert
Just my wired thoughts
cheeeerio, hugi
--
Andreas Bürki -
abuerki AT cacert.org
CAcert Assurer for People & Organizations
CAcert.org - Secure Together
http://www.cacert.org
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, (continued)
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Elwing, 03/23/2010
- HSM escrow - was: Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/23/2010
- Re: HSM escrow - was: Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: HSM escrow - was: Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/24/2010
- Re: HSM escrow - was: Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Dieter Hennig, 03/23/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Lambert Hofstra, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Elwing, 03/25/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/25/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/25/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Elwing, 03/25/2010
- HSM escrow - was: Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/23/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/23/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Andreas Bürki, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Andreas Bürki, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Dieter Hennig, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Andreas Bürki, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Elwing, 03/23/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.