Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cacert-policy - Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Andreas Bürki <abuerki AT cacert.org>
  • To: cacert-root AT lists.cacert.org
  • Cc: Daniel Black <daniel AT cacert.org>, "cacert-board AT lists.cacert.org" <cacert-board AT lists.cacert.org>, "cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org" <cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org>, Lambert <lambert AT cacert.org>
  • Subject: Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow
  • Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:47:35 +0100
  • Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
  • Organization: CAcert Inc.

Thoughts at random:

*    Why multi-member approach is not more focused on organizations?
        *    CAcert ORGA assured organizations are CAcert members as well
        *    Organizations will probably "live" longer than an human member
        *    Organizations have very often something to loose, at least
their reputation.
        *    Organizations have very often the physical infrastructure
to protect root keys
       
And, yes of course, such organizations could be well known and serious
universities, which are member of CAcert

Just my wired thoughts


cheeeerio, hugi

-- 
Andreas Bürki - 
abuerki AT cacert.org
CAcert Assurer for People & Organizations

CAcert.org - Secure Together
http://www.cacert.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page