Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cacert-policy - Re: HSM escrow - was: Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

Re: HSM escrow - was: Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Mark Lipscombe <mark AT cacert.org>
  • To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
  • Subject: Re: HSM escrow - was: Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow
  • Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:57:18 +1100
  • Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none

On 3/24/2010 10:26 AM, Daniel Black wrote:
Rather than create yet another proposal rather late in process (board will be
deciding within a week), can you comment constructively on the current
proposals?

I'm not sure there is a consensus for this amongst board members. If there are better proposals to be put forward, I, for one, would be happy for us to take as long as is reasonably necessary to develop the best policy we can.

It also looks as though a lot of people missed (the bulk of) the discussion that originally took place, so a lot of useful feedback, comments and alternatives may have not been given the opportunity to be fleshed out.

Deciding on the policy surrounding escrow of the root key is one part of a wider effort to establish the new roots, and I assume that a formal decision on escrow policy isn't yet a implementation blocker?

Regards,
Mark



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page