Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Daniel Black <daniel AT cacert.org>
- To: Andreas Bürki <abuerki AT cacert.org>, "cacert-board AT lists.cacert.org" <cacert-board AT lists.cacert.org>, "cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org" <cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org>, Lambert <lambert AT cacert.org>, cacert-root AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:57:11 +1100
- Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
- Organization: CAcert
On Wednesday 24 March 2010 11:47:35 you wrote:
> Thoughts at random:
>
> * Why multi-member approach is not more focused on organizations?
> * CAcert ORGA assured organizations are CAcert members as well
> * Organizations will probably "live" longer than an human member
> * Organizations have very often something to loose, at least
> their reputation.
> * Organizations have very often the physical infrastructure
> to protect root keys
>
> And, yes of course, such organizations could be well known and serious
> universities, which are member of CAcert
In Principles
"Key Holder could be Organisation Assured community members who have a long
term interest in the safety of our root key. "
http://wiki.cacert.org/Roots/EscrowAndRecovery/MultiMemberEscrow
its definitely under consideration for all the reasons you mentioned.
--
Daniel Black
CAcert
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, (continued)
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Andreas Bürki, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Dieter Hennig, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Andreas Bürki, 03/24/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.