Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Ian G <iang AT cacert.org>
- To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:03:07 +1100
- Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
On 24/03/2010 13:00, Mark Lipscombe wrote:
On 3/24/2010 12:48 PM, Daniel Black wrote:
On Wednesday 24 March 2010 11:52:49 Mark Lipscombe wrote:
they can't remember passphrase
On the cacert-roots list it was discussed that password storage is
acceptable
if stored separately.
Was any consideration given to how this contrasts with DRC C.3.e:
The root certificate private key pass-phrase (i.e. password) is not
stored electronically or physically.
I've thought about it, and I think what this means is that the human has to remember the password. I think this is actually bad advice, and it is not how things have traditionally been done in CAcert. Nor is it likely to work, because remembered passwords have to be used frequently, or be very simple (or both).
So, this is one area where I expect the criteria will not be followed, and there will be an appeal to the auditor on the basis of more modern advice. I'd be expecting the passphrases be written down and the piece of paper be kept safe.
That's just my call, though. Another possibility is to go back to David Ross and discuss the criteria with him.
iang
I suppose it might be argued that stored "parts" of the passphrase in
several locations is not the same as the pass-phrase being "stored", but
it seems like a stretch.
I tried looking through the cacert-root archives, but couldn't find
anything that answered this.
Regards,
Mark
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, (continued)
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Lambert Hofstra, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Elwing, 03/25/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/25/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/25/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Elwing, 03/25/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/23/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Andreas Bürki, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Andreas Bürki, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Dieter Hennig, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Andreas Bürki, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Andreas Bürki, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Lambert Hofstra, 03/24/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.