Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Mark Lipscombe <mark AT cacert.org>
- To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
- Cc: Ian G <iang AT cacert.org>
- Subject: Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:06:09 +1100
- Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
On 3/24/2010 3:03 PM, Ian G wrote:
On 24/03/2010 13:00, Mark Lipscombe wrote:
Was any consideration given to how this contrasts with DRC C.3.e:
The root certificate private key pass-phrase (i.e. password) is not
stored electronically or physically.
I've thought about it, and I think what this means is that the human has
to remember the password. I think this is actually bad advice, and it is
not how things have traditionally been done in CAcert. Nor is it likely
to work, because remembered passwords have to be used frequently, or be
very simple (or both).
So, this is one area where I expect the criteria will not be followed,
and there will be an appeal to the auditor on the basis of more modern
advice. I'd be expecting the passphrases be written down and the piece
of paper be kept safe.
That's just my call, though. Another possibility is to go back to David
Ross and discuss the criteria with him.
Yes, you're right that it does seem like a questionable criteria. Perhaps we should discuss it with David, and failing that, documenting our "compensating controls" as part of our case for ignoring that criteria.
What does Webtrust have to say on the subject?
Regards,
Mark
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, (continued)
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Elwing, 03/25/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/25/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/25/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/23/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Andreas Bürki, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Andreas Bürki, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Dieter Hennig, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Mark Lipscombe, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Ian G, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Andreas Bürki, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Andreas Bürki, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Daniel Black, 03/24/2010
- Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow, Elwing, 03/25/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.