Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cacert-policy - Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Mark Lipscombe <mark AT cacert.org>
  • To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
  • Cc: Ian G <iang AT cacert.org>
  • Subject: Re: Board inquisition of Multi-member escrow
  • Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:06:09 +1100
  • Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none

On 3/24/2010 3:03 PM, Ian G wrote:
On 24/03/2010 13:00, Mark Lipscombe wrote:
Was any consideration given to how this contrasts with DRC C.3.e:

The root certificate private key pass-phrase (i.e. password) is not
stored electronically or physically.

I've thought about it, and I think what this means is that the human has
to remember the password. I think this is actually bad advice, and it is
not how things have traditionally been done in CAcert. Nor is it likely
to work, because remembered passwords have to be used frequently, or be
very simple (or both).

So, this is one area where I expect the criteria will not be followed,
and there will be an appeal to the auditor on the basis of more modern
advice. I'd be expecting the passphrases be written down and the piece
of paper be kept safe.

That's just my call, though. Another possibility is to go back to David
Ross and discuss the criteria with him.

Yes, you're right that it does seem like a questionable criteria. Perhaps we should discuss it with David, and failing that, documenting our "compensating controls" as part of our case for ignoring that criteria.

What does Webtrust have to say on the subject?

Regards,
Mark



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page