Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Daniel Black <daniel AT cacert.org>
- To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: stopping the Assurance
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:02:15 +1100
- Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
- Organization: CAcert
Gathering more evidence would be useful.
Tearing up identity documents, usually government property in personal
possession(?), is probably illegal (or at least dangerous for the assurer).
In a case of mistrust I think compelling or encouraging to continue beyond a
person's comfort is the wrong thing.
I'd rather get an Assurance Policy that shows how to do assurances properly
and is as short as possible. This would leave the edge cases to personal
judgement so forcing them down a line doesn't risk the WoT integrity.
--
Daniel Black
CAcert
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- Re: stopping the Assurance, (continued)
- Re: stopping the Assurance, Lambert Hofstra, 03/21/2010
- Re: stopping the Assurance, J. Steijlen, 03/21/2010
- RE: stopping the Assurance, Ernestine, 03/21/2010
- Re: stopping the Assurance, Ian G, 03/22/2010
- Re: stopping the Assurance, Barry Berg, 03/21/2010
- Re: stopping the Assurance, Nathan Edward Tuggy, 03/21/2010
- Re: stopping the Assurance, Barry Berg, 03/22/2010
- RE: stopping the Assurance, Peter Williams, 03/22/2010
- Re: stopping the Assurance, Ian G, 03/23/2010
- RE: stopping the Assurance, Peter Williams, 03/22/2010
- Re: stopping the Assurance, Ian G, 03/26/2010
- Re: stopping the Assurance, Barry Berg, 03/22/2010
- Re: stopping the Assurance, Nathan Edward Tuggy, 03/21/2010
- Re: stopping the Assurance, Daniel Black, 03/25/2010
- Re: stopping the Assurance, Peter Williams, 03/25/2010
- Re: stopping the Assurance, Lambert Hofstra, 03/21/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.