Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Ian G <iang AT cacert.org>
- To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: SP => POLICY?
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:56:29 +1100
- Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
Summary so far here:
On 23/03/2010 08:13, Ian G wrote:
According to PoP, a policy can only be in DRAFT for a year ...
Security Policy reaches this milestone this Saturday, following p20090327.
https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/SecurityPolicy.html
Now, there are some marked up suggestions in BLUE that have not been
voted upon. These basically add an "Application Engineer" who is
responsible for the application. We would need to make a bit of a
decision here as to which way we want to go.
1. Keep SP in DRAFT for another period, and
re-work those BLUE sections.
I see 3 preferences for this: Andreas, Ernie, Daniel.
2. Accept the BLUE, and go to POLICY.
One "accept" for this, but second vote after 1. above.
3. Discard the BLUE as not voted, and go to POLICY.
4. Or?
What do policy group people vote for?
iang
PS: Green should disappear.
- Re: SP => POLICY?, (continued)
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/26/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Daniel Black, 03/26/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Mario Lipinski, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Mark Lipscombe, 03/27/2010
- Whether the Association is under PoP, Ian G, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Mark Lipscombe, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY? (board background checks + outsourcing), Daniel Black, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Mario Lipinski, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Mark Lipscombe, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY? - board background checks - veto motion m20100327.2, Daniel Black, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Daniel Black, 03/26/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/26/2010
- RE: SP => POLICY?, ulrich, 03/26/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Faramir, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Michael Tänzer, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Nathan Edward Tuggy, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Lambert Hofstra, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/26/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.