Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cacert-policy - Re: SP => POLICY?

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

Re: SP => POLICY?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ian G <iang AT cacert.org>
  • To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
  • Subject: Re: SP => POLICY?
  • Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:56:29 +1100
  • Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none

Summary so far here:


On 23/03/2010 08:13, Ian G wrote:
According to PoP, a policy can only be in DRAFT for a year ...

Security Policy reaches this milestone this Saturday, following p20090327.

https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/SecurityPolicy.html

Now, there are some marked up suggestions in BLUE that have not been
voted upon. These basically add an "Application Engineer" who is
responsible for the application. We would need to make a bit of a
decision here as to which way we want to go.

1. Keep SP in DRAFT for another period, and
re-work those BLUE sections.


I see 3 preferences for this:  Andreas, Ernie, Daniel.


2. Accept the BLUE, and go to POLICY.


One "accept" for this, but second vote after 1. above.

3. Discard the BLUE as not voted, and go to POLICY.

4. Or?



What do policy group people vote for?



iang

PS: Green should disappear.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page