cacert-policy - Re: SP => POLICY?

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

Re: SP => POLICY?

From: Michael Tänzer <michael.taenzer AT cacert.org>
To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
Subject: Re: SP => POLICY?
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 02:11:42 +0100
Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
Openpgp: id=9940BEF1

Hi,

Ernestine schrieb:
> For now I'm for 1.

Me too.

> Some mentioned Teams are not already "built", and for me is not clear how
> the 4-eyes would work, if one team is within the other team.

Do you mean Application engineers belonging to the SA team?
Yes that's my concern too.

> The SE-team-overview on the support-page is also not up-to-date.

Thank you for reminding me of that (there were some very recent changes
in the support team). Fixed.

Have a nice day,
--
Michael Tänzer
CAcert Support Team Leader

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/23/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Andreas Bürki, 03/23/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Dieter Hennig, 03/23/2010
  - Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/23/2010
    - Re: SP => POLICY?, Dieter Hennig, 03/23/2010
      - Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/24/2010
        
        Re: SP => POLICY?, Dieter Hennig, 03/24/2010
- RE: SP => POLICY?, Ernestine, 03/23/2010
  - Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/24/2010
  - Re: SP => POLICY?, Michael Tänzer, 03/27/2010
    - Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP review questions comments and improvements, Daniel Black, 03/25/2010
  - Re: SP holes/ questions - root key managment, Daniel Black, 03/27/2010
    - Re: SP holes/ questions - root key managment, Ian G, 03/27/2010
      - Re: SP holes/ questions - root key managment - board control, Daniel Black, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Daniel Black, 03/25/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/26/2010
  - Re: SP => POLICY?, Daniel Black, 03/26/2010
    - Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/27/2010
      - Re: SP => POLICY?, Mario Lipinski, 03/27/2010

List archive

Re: SP => POLICY?