cacert-policy - Re: SP => POLICY?

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

Re: SP => POLICY?

From: Ian G <iang AT cacert.org>
To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
Subject: Re: SP => POLICY?
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:31:14 +1100
Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none

On 27/03/2010 12:11, Michael Tänzer wrote:

Hi,

Ernestine schrieb:

For now I'm for 1.

Me too.

And Ulrich, that makes 5. That's much more of a quorum, so this will likely be the option.

https://wiki.cacert.org/PolicyDecisions#p20100326

Guys, last chance to record your vote! We have to close before the PoP deadline expires... today.

iang

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/23/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Andreas Bürki, 03/23/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Dieter Hennig, 03/23/2010
  - Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/23/2010
    - Re: SP => POLICY?, Dieter Hennig, 03/23/2010
      - Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/24/2010
        
        Re: SP => POLICY?, Dieter Hennig, 03/24/2010
- RE: SP => POLICY?, Ernestine, 03/23/2010
  - Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/24/2010
  - Re: SP => POLICY?, Michael Tänzer, 03/27/2010
    - Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP review questions comments and improvements, Daniel Black, 03/25/2010
  - Re: SP holes/ questions - root key managment, Daniel Black, 03/27/2010
    - Re: SP holes/ questions - root key managment, Ian G, 03/27/2010
      - Re: SP holes/ questions - root key managment - board control, Daniel Black, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Daniel Black, 03/25/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/26/2010
  - Re: SP => POLICY?, Daniel Black, 03/26/2010
    - Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/27/2010
      - Re: SP => POLICY?, Mario Lipinski, 03/27/2010
        
        Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/27/2010

List archive

Re: SP => POLICY?