cacert-policy - Re: SP => POLICY?

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

Re: SP => POLICY?

From: Mario Lipinski <mario AT cacert.org>
To: cacert-board AT lists.cacert.org
Cc: Ian G <iang AT cacert.org>, cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
Subject: Re: SP => POLICY?
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:48:13 -0700
Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
Organization: CAcert (Board member, Organisation Assurance Germany, Wiki/Issue admin)

Hi,

I agree with Daniel. Community cannot limit the association in doing it's business. So this parts might even be void.

I also have my doubts concerning

9.3.2.  Response to external (legal) inquiry

If there is a legal inquiry to CAcert Inc. it is board business. Not of an arbitrator. Since the board members are legally responsible for managing the association during their election period.

--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards

Mario Lipinski
Board member,                       E-Mail:
mario AT cacert.org
Organisation Assurer (Germany),     Internet: http://www.cacert.org
Wiki/Issue admin
CAcert

Support CAcert: http://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=13
                http://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/HelpingCAcert

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: SP => POLICY?, (continued)
- Re: SP review questions comments and improvements, Daniel Black, 03/25/2010
  - Re: SP holes/ questions - root key managment, Daniel Black, 03/27/2010
    - Re: SP holes/ questions - root key managment, Ian G, 03/27/2010
      - Re: SP holes/ questions - root key managment - board control, Daniel Black, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Daniel Black, 03/25/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/26/2010
  - Re: SP => POLICY?, Daniel Black, 03/26/2010
    - Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/27/2010
      - Re: SP => POLICY?, Mario Lipinski, 03/27/2010
        
        Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/27/2010
        
        Re: SP => POLICY?, Mark Lipscombe, 03/27/2010
        
        Whether the Association is under PoP, Ian G, 03/27/2010
      - Re: SP => POLICY? (board background checks + outsourcing), Daniel Black, 03/27/2010
    - Re: SP => POLICY?, Mark Lipscombe, 03/27/2010
    - Re: SP => POLICY? - board background checks - veto motion m20100327.2, Daniel Black, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/26/2010
- RE: SP => POLICY?, ulrich, 03/26/2010
  - Re: SP => POLICY?, Faramir, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Michael Tänzer, 03/27/2010

List archive

Re: SP => POLICY?