Policy-Discussion

["Ernestine" <ernestine AT cacert.org>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Lipscombe 
> [mailto:mark AT cacert.org]
>  , Sent: Saturday, March 27,
2010 10:27 PM
> To: 
> cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
> Subject: Re: SP 9.3.2
> 
> On 3/28/2010 5:21 AM, Ernestine wrote:
> > I'm not sure, if you can say every person is a legal 
> entity. If somebody has
> > a claim, he could try to see it in this way, to go maybe 
> the easier shorter
> > way.
> 
> Perhaps it's a misunderstanding, but an entity is:
> 
>      An entity is something that exists separately from other
>      things and has a clear identity of its own.
> 
> People are always "entities", bodies corporate are often, but not 
> always, entities.
> 
> In the context I was talking about, an entity is something or someone 
> that can be obligated by some legal process, like a subpoena.

I think It is not a misunderstanding, we are speaking from the same, maybe a
bad wording from myself.


> A court or prosecuting authority won't necessarily look for the most 
> convenient method to us, they will look for the most 
> convenient method 
> for them, which may involve subpoenaing someone individually simply 
> because they reside in a convenient location.

*to go maybe the easier shorter way* - of course looking for them.

ernie

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature