Policy-Discussion

[Lambert Hofstra <lamberthofstra AT gmail.com>]

I'm in favour of option 1

Lambert


Ian G wrote, On 22/03/2010 22:13:
> According to PoP, a policy can only be in DRAFT for a year ...
>
> Security Policy reaches this milestone this Saturday, following
> p20090327.
>
> https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/SecurityPolicy.html
>
> Now, there are some marked up suggestions in BLUE that have not been
> voted upon.  These basically add an "Application Engineer" who is
> responsible for the application.  We would need to make a bit of a
> decision here as to which way we want to go.
>
> 1.  Keep SP in DRAFT for another period, and
>     re-work those BLUE sections.
>
> 2.  Accept the BLUE, and go to POLICY.
>
> 3.  Discard the BLUE as not voted, and go to POLICY.
>
> 4.  Or?
>
>
>
> What do policy group people vote for?
>
>
>
> iang
>
> PS: Green should disappear.
>