cacert-policy - Re: SP => POLICY? - board background checks - veto motion m20100327.2

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

Re: SP => POLICY? - board background checks - veto motion m20100327.2

From: Daniel Black <daniel AT cacert.org>
To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
Subject: Re: SP => POLICY? - board background checks - veto motion m20100327.2
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 09:18:28 +1100
Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
Organization: CAcert

On Friday 26 March 2010 15:10:36 Daniel Black wrote:
>
> 1. background check of board members

FYI a veto motion has been created covering the policy above for the reason
below.

https://community.cacert.org/board/motions.php?motion=m20100327.2

> 1.1 requiring a background check of the board is a decision for the CAcert
> Inc members not the policy group

--
Daniel Black
Vice President
CAcert

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: SP => POLICY?, (continued)
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Daniel Black, 03/25/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/26/2010
  - Re: SP => POLICY?, Daniel Black, 03/26/2010
    - Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/27/2010
      - Re: SP => POLICY?, Mario Lipinski, 03/27/2010
        
        Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/27/2010
        
        Re: SP => POLICY?, Mark Lipscombe, 03/27/2010
        
        Whether the Association is under PoP, Ian G, 03/27/2010
      - Re: SP => POLICY? (board background checks + outsourcing), Daniel Black, 03/27/2010
    - Re: SP => POLICY?, Mark Lipscombe, 03/27/2010
    - Re: SP => POLICY? - board background checks - veto motion m20100327.2, Daniel Black, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Ian G, 03/26/2010
- RE: SP => POLICY?, ulrich, 03/26/2010
  - Re: SP => POLICY?, Faramir, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Michael Tänzer, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Nathan Edward Tuggy, 03/27/2010
- Re: SP => POLICY?, Lambert Hofstra, 03/27/2010

List archive

Re: SP => POLICY? - board background checks - veto motion m20100327.2