Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cacert-policy - Re: Remove Board background checks from DRAFT Security Policy

Subject: Policy-Discussion

List archive

Re: Remove Board background checks from DRAFT Security Policy

Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ian G <iang AT>
  • To: cacert-policy AT
  • Cc: Andreas Bürki <abuerki AT>, Monsieur Guillaume Romagny <guillaume AT>, 'Pieter van Emmerik' <pve.cacert AT>
  • Subject: Re: Remove Board background checks from DRAFT Security Policy
  • Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:34:11 +1100
  • Authentication-results:; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT; dkim-asp=none

On 30/03/2010 20:53, Andreas Bürki wrote:
As it seems my vote for:

Remove Board background checks from DRAFT Security Policy

Has been registered as: "Materially misrecorded" [1] for whatever reason!

Yes, you recorded support for the veto, which was not a motion before the policy group. Your mail recorded support for this statement by GR:

    "As a CAcert association member, I fully agree with the schema
    and reasons to veto the Security Policy."

Which is good, but that's a board decision, and not a policy group motion.

I state here again:

***I vote for removal of board background checks from DRAFT Security

I would like, that my vote counts as the vote of any member of this
policy list. Otherwise, please tell me, what mistake I have done.

That's super, Andreas, but no question has been correctly and fairly presented to the Policy Group. And at this stage, because of the veto, it is difficult to present fairly, because people will need to understand and vote in the face of the actions of the Board, which means independence of the policy group is lost.

I expect, that I will be immediately listed as Wytze, in the section
"For removal" [1]

That motion is vacated, improper.

Cheers, iang.

Best regards

Andreas Bürki aka hugi


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page