Policy-Discussion

[Mark Lipscombe <mark AT cacert.org>]

On 4/1/2010 8:28 AM, Philipp Dunkel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I can live with that. If it is clear that the board as such has no actual 
> access, but is simply in charge of controlling/managing access, then this is 
> fine.
>
> May I propose the following as the Road-Map we take:
>
> * First we agree that due to the Boards Veto, the Security Policy in now a WIP
> * Second we remedy Security Policy and move it back to DRAFT for a period of 
> 1 Month
> * Third we Move the Security Policy to POLICY when that time expires.
>
> Is there a rough consensus on this Road-Map?

I agree that this is the best way forward, and support Philipp's proposal.

I propose that once it goes back into WIP that we remove the word 
"Board" from the appropriate section and take a vote on moving it back 
to DRAFT.

Regards,
Mark