Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Ian G <iang AT cacert.org>
- To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: CACert Root Distribution for Fedora
- Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 01:22:52 +1100
- Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
On 1/11/11 05:39 AM, Philipp Dunkel wrote:
I just left a rather lengthy comment on that bug and offered myself as a
point of contact to explain the situation and intricacies to them from our
POV.
It was a good post! It pretty much covered my points in long written form.
I've just added two comments...
It would be helpful if others can post and express their notions. It's not really plausible for one person to do this alone, which is probably why Sascha failed to impress them last year.
Now that we know where it is to post, that helps a lot!
On Oct 31, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Bruce Alspaugh wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Licensing/CACert_Root_Distribution_License
- Re: CACert Root Distribution for Fedora, Michael Tänzer, 11/01/2011
- Re: CACert Root Distribution for Fedora, Ian G, 11/01/2011
- Re: CACert Root Distribution for Fedora, Michael Tänzer, 11/01/2011
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: CACert Root Distribution for Fedora, Ian G, 11/01/2011
- Re: CACert Root Distribution for Fedora, Ian G, 11/01/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.