Policy-Discussion

[Guillaume ROMAGNY <guillaume AT cacert.org>]

Hello Bruce,

Le 07/11/2011 23:50, Bruce Alspaugh a écrit :

Based on Red Hat's last comment, it sounds like they won't listen to us unless CACert has an official lawyer who can talk to their lawyer:

 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549#c59

 

I thought it might be worth a try to find out whether the Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) might be able to offer CACert some pro-bono legal assistance to deal with this and other issues. 

 

http://www.softwarefreedom.org/

 

I am supposed to talk to one of their lawyers on Nov. 14.  Who should I be putting them in contact with?  Are there particular issues I should bring up?

 

Bruce

I don't know about Redhat side but we could need an Australian lawyer to check/review the all the interesting work done by Ulrich to update the association rules to be compliant with the new Act of 2009.

For Redhat talks, we could ask Ian who is good at dealing with the issue on the CAcert side.

thanks.

my 2 cents.

Best regards,

Guillaume

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME