Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Benedikt Heintel <benedikt AT cacert.org>
- To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC)
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 23:19:37 +0100
- Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Aren't there any lawyers in the CAcert Inc.? We might have a look
around if someone of them is keen to help us out. The reward might be
CAcert as trusted CA in another OS.
My 2 ct.
Cheers Benedikt
Am 10.11.2011 00:49, schrieb Faramir:
> El 07-11-2011 19:50, Bruce Alspaugh escribió:
>> Based on Red Hat's last comment, it sounds like they won't
>> listen to us unless CACert has an official lawyer who can talk to
>> their lawyer:
>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549#c59
>
>> I thought it might be worth a try to find out whether the
>> Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) might be able to offer CACert
>> some pro-bono legal assistance to deal with this and other
>> issues.
>
>> http://www.softwarefreedom.org/
>
> Well, I'm not even an associated member, but I think it is a good
> idea to have a lawyer helping us with that. If I understood it
> right, our 3th parties licence aims to "use it anyway you want, as
> long as you don't blame us -not sue us- if something doesn't go as
> you expected". Something as the typical "as is" disclaimer some
> software uses. But what should be simple to communicate, becomes
> complex when it has to be expressed in legal language.
>
> So, if we have to convince their lawyers, that sounds like a job
> for another lawyer.
>
> Best Regards
- --
Benedikt Heintel -
benedikt AT cacert.org
CAcert Assurer for People & Organizations
CAcert.org - Secure Together
http://www.cacert.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOvE30AAoJENbgF4ATVpsruWIH/0Ozqi4N2A7/Onh10eE7ReiP
doOHilZoznE2MAHqkG5JvS3sfVxs3cD8boDUMDTC5PZl6wH5ks7qowmrDZaOOTUN
II89YSc9y01h2Dqu2tYG0toHw1FUfgHIMZmLyhx7O6f7/2/r4mxlEv4bVC+2YJ6x
voRZhRbQZspegKMa7GskTjBCr2Q8iaA0Vl9XgvNTmUwdCSaR0La7J8tScRlY5HWU
YiUvbPg5M2k5TJ8G/uK6Dqo9HG+3ddImTBYQr4M0sRWEkZz8KE84G9qX1SpQ79+2
J5utQLfQYNG1pBwy8ZRnsTkw49/zBePVfh+soaeRzitkk7lPYMlE9DcB4N0Lf0I=
=+RNw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift
- Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC), Bruce Alspaugh, 11/07/2011
- Re: Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC), Guillaume ROMAGNY, 11/07/2011
- Re: Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC), Ian G, 11/08/2011
- Re: Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC), Faramir, 11/09/2011
- Re: Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC), Benedikt Heintel, 11/10/2011
- Re: Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC), Werner Dworak, 11/25/2011
- AW: Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC), ulrich, 11/26/2011
- Re: Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC), Werner Dworak, 11/25/2011
- Re: Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC), Benedikt Heintel, 11/10/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.